Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B550M DS3H AC  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 10:10
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 71.6
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 882
87% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,020
63% 1,020 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.8% Above average
Lighting 75.9
Reflection 77.4
Parallax 74.5
62% 75.9 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 59.5
53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT128G1002 128GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2317002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 427
Write 156
Mixed 188
56% 257 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 12.2
89% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 78.2
83% 137 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
161GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 180 179 180 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 170
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 179
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
64.5% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 24.7
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 22.8
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550M DS3H AC Builds (Compare 1,908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte B550M DS3H AC - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback