Asus P9X79 LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 LE  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 08:22
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 561
58% 469 Pts
64-Core 719
44% 719 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
777GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 427 430 424 437 444 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 440
Mixed 376
SusWrite 432
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 39.6
132% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 359
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
WD Black 6TB (2016)-$222
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 210 201 208 208 209 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 210
Mixed 77
SusWrite 208
128% 177 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
195% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 121%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G3D1869DE1TX0 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 31.9
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 LE Builds (Compare 1,140 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 LE - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback