Microelectronics G233

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemMicroelectronics G233  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B660M-A AC D4
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 05:41
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 177
2-Core 331
105% 197 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 949
92% 757 Pts
64-Core 1,171
72% 1,171 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.88
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 117
Parallax 125
108% 125 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 102
Splatting 84.9
86% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
803GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1369 537 563 575 587 557 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,626
Write 1,941
Mixed 1,832
SusWrite 698
344% 1,524 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 81.9
308% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1392
DQ Write 1,010
DQ Mixed 1,174
884% 1,192 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 255%
Great: 300%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-2666C19-8GNT 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 32
99% 34.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 26.8
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G233 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Microelectronics G233

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback