Lenovo 90NC00JAUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics73.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90NC00JAUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3717
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime18.6 Days
Run DateMar 24 '23 at 14:45
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 782
78% 633 Pts
64-Core 956
59% 956 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
MSI(1462 3797) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.65
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.1% Very good
Lighting 92
Reflection 89.9
Parallax 84.2
75% 88.7 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 78.7
Splatting 71.1
70% 87.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-256G-1001 256GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,578
Write 1,514
Mixed 1,423
336% 1,505 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 68.4
239% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 689
DQ Mixed 852
639% 861 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 228%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$82
566GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 407 406 457 459 458 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 48.9
Mixed 360
SusWrite 435
58% 256 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 54.1
178% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 157
171% 288 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 105%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U2S8MR-8 Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CVF 16GB
3200, 2933 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 23
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 24.5
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90NC00JAUS Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Lenovo 90NC00JAUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $319
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback