HP 500-211el

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	HP 500-211el (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140205
Uptime	7.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '23 at 09:07
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$65 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 78.2 1-Core 105 2-Core 183 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 473 51% 406 Pts	64-Core 512 32% 512 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.1% Average	Lighting 54.4 Reflection 56 Parallax 47.9 44% 52.8 fps	MRender 41.8 Gravity 50.7 Splatting 45.6 38% 46 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 228 203 183 172 168 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 447 Write 429 Mixed 377 SusWrite 206 82% 365 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 61.1 4K Mixed 41.8 137% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 341 259% 348 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 124%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 562GB free Firmware: SBFKZ1.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 397 414 438 441 436 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 152 Write 65 Mixed 32.4 SusWrite 402 37% 163 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 14 4K Mixed 8.7 40% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 13.2 DQ Write 13 DQ Mixed 12.6 10% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GB 174 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 20.7 MC Mixed 16.5 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 16.9 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 500-211el Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: HP 500-211el

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	10x
Core i7-4770IntelBench 76%, 498 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	4x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	2x
Radeon HD 5670AMDBench 6%, 18,196 samples	1x

SSD
HyperX 3K 480GBKingston $256Bench 60%, 1,827 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
99U5471-052.A00LF Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GBKingstonBench 50%, 7 samples	2x
HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 29%, 2,350 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $321

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16