AMD Hudson-D3L

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAMD Hudson-D3L  (all builds)
MotherboardZillion A88F2AL2
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '23 at 06:01
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Memory 46.5
1-Core 56.1
2-Core 68.7
36% 57.1 Pts
4-Core 66.8
8-Core 73.4
9% 70.1 Pts
64-Core 75
5% 75 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.25% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 7.4
4% 6.13 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 7.6
5% 5.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37/240GB 240GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN3060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 29 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.4% Very poor
Read 110
Write 116
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 44.9
20% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 8.7
32% 9.43 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 45.7
DQ Mixed 25.6
22% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-033.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hudson-D3L Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: AMD Hudson-D3L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback