Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2320-$165 38,345 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 80.1 2-Core 157 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 266 36% 268 Pts	64-Core 270 17% 270 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 84F2) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.02% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 3.1 3% 3.4 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.3 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.02% Great: 6%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$117 11,742 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1225G Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 206 Write 151 Mixed 148 37% 168 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 24.8 4K Mixed 22.2 77% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 31.6 DQ Write 74.9 DQ Mixed 31.2 30% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 114%
Generic USB SD Reader 4GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 6200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 18.2 Write 5.7 Mixed 5.2 10% 9.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 6GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 12.1 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 11.1 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	274x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	52x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	39x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	36x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 5,657 samples	29x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	18x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $103