Lenovo 10FVS0LA00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10FVS0LA00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30BE
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '23 at 19:29
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 68%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$134
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 177
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 278
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Nvidia(10DE 2187) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.3% Above average
Lighting 79.2
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 76.2
64% 77.8 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 45.8
49% 61.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD_2.5"_TLC_256GB_InnovationIT 256GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0609B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 123 171 86 85 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 392
Write 305
Mixed 305
SusWrite 104
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 14
71% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 30.4
75% 151 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A1K43BB2-CRC 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 19.7
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 17.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10FVS0LA00 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 10FVS0LA00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $434
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback