Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemSupermicro Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H11SSL-i
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '23 at 16:26
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7551P 32-Core
CPU, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 33
2-Core 67.1
34% 52.4 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 244
22% 188 Pts
64-Core 2,516
156% 2,516 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Viper VP4300 2TB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 643 685 757 1201 1536 1582 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 384
Write 388
Mixed 420
SusWrite 1,067
129% 565 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 19
59% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 240
222% 355 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 117%
Great: 649%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965742-049.B00G 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 14.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.8
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $596
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback