Lenovo 20EGS1FB00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20EGS1FB00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EGS1FB00
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150901
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 23 '23 at 11:22
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$46
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 62.7
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 179
61% 110 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 447
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 96.4
6% 96.4 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 221E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 5.7
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN010754
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 361 330 356 399 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 367
Write 358
Mixed 348
SusWrite 328
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 22.2
78% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 150
123% 170 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 98%
Toshiba MK3276GSX 320GB-$12
35GB free
Firmware: GS101X
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 72 73 73 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 61.8
Write 69.4
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 71.6
41% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.2% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 5.6
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 7.8
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20EGS1FB00 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20EGS1FB00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $46
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback