HP Pavilion All-in-One 27-d1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion All-in-One 27-d1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 885E
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 23 '23 at 01:23
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i7-11700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 133
2-Core 253
83% 153 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 742
73% 595 Pts
64-Core 1,056
65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750
HP(103C 885E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
7.09% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 25
Parallax 9.3
6% 14 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 12
Splatting 8.4
8% 10.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.09%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HALB-000H1 1TB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 185 146 143 151 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 831
Write 281
Mixed 390
SusWrite 165
92% 417 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 26
94% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 626
DQ Write 50.8
DQ Mixed 113
139% 263 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 269%
WD My Passport 259F 1TB
926GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 116
Write 115
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 79.9
121% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 18.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 20.1
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion All-in-One 27-d1xxx Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion All-in-One 27-d1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback