Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory	89.4 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '23 at 19:14
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 0 1,235 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Memory 51.7 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 139 49% 86.9 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 419 43% 345 Pts	64-Core 999 62% 999 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.74 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.1% Below average	Lighting 38.5 Reflection 40.3 Parallax 36.3 31% 38.4 fps	MRender 48.9 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 38.3 33% 41.3 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 479GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 232 237 238 239 239 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.1% Above average	Read 246 Write 233 Mixed 222 SusWrite 235 53% 234 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 25.1 82% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 147 114% 157 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 572GB free Firmware: 3B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 238 238 239 239 239 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.6% Above average	Read 246 Write 238 Mixed 233 SusWrite 238 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 26.6 86% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 162 122% 163 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 267GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 140 137 138 138 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 138 Write 109 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 138 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-477.A Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 9965516-477.A Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 9965516-477.A Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 9965516-477.A Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 96GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	76.8% Very good	MC Read 34 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 29.5 90% 31.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 6.6 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 01stBench 68%, 674 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	2x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	1x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $190Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	1x
SSDSC2CT080A4 80GBIntelBench 60%, 377 samples	1x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4A 8x8GBHynixBench 89%, 32 samples	2x
M393B1G73QH0- 8x8GBSamsungBench 97%, 17 samples	1x
M393B5170EH1- Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C M393B5170EH1- Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C Hynix HMT151R7BFR4... 64GBSamsungBench 84%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $130

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16