Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 436%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 580%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics363% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive466% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory15.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '23 at 08:30
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$461
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 82.8
1-Core 223
2-Core 459
130% 255 Pts
4-Core 903
8-Core 1,734
157% 1,318 Pts
64-Core 4,169
258% 4,169 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 126%
Great: 135%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
8.25% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 10.7
8% 11.6 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 10.4
9% 11.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.25%
Great: 10%
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
CLim: 3390 MHz, MLim: 6100 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
363% Outstanding
Lighting 587
Reflection 572
Parallax 748
478% 636 fps
MRender 461
Gravity 534
Splatting 269
330% 421 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 363%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4012 3140 2599 2320 2294 2706 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
466% Outstanding
Read 2493
Write 4,270
Mixed 3094
SusWrite 2,845
721% 3,176 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 255
4K Mixed 111
366% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1,965
DQ Write 1,586
DQ Mixed 1,554
1,224% 1,702 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 466%
Great: 614%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
307GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2249 1649 1639 1622 1644 1602 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
368% Outstanding
Read 2,326
Write 2,009
Mixed 1,738
SusWrite 1,734
438% 1,952 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 87.3
296% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,948
DQ Write 1,520
DQ Mixed 1,680
1,272% 1,716 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 368%
Great: 410%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 900GB
743GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 610 609 596 606 607 610 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 707
Write 622
Mixed 354
SusWrite 606
128% 572 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 27.5
101% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 405
312% 417 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 115%
Great: 177%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400
209GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 447 450 432 456 442 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 336
Write 442
Mixed 311
SusWrite 446
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 36
132% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 302
227% 304 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6400J3239G162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
188% Outstanding
MC Read 77.8
MC Write 72.4
MC Mixed 73.4
213% 74.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 33.3
96% 33.6 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 143%
This bench: 188%
Great: 218%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 5,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $964
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback