Acer Aspire TC-705

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-705  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-705
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 22 '23 at 08:03
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 71
1-Core 92
2-Core 178
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 238
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0750) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2
Parallax 3.9
2% 2.87 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.5%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EXRAM 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 180 258 207 153 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 347
Write 302
Mixed 242
SusWrite 190
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 55.4
4K Mixed 26.5
99% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 80.5
DQ Mixed 35.2
32% 47 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 79%
WD WD5000AAKX-22ERMA0 493GB
442GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 106 104 103 105 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 104
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030KQ68F9F1600 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 14.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-705 Builds (Compare 551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-705

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback