Micro UM773 Lite

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro UM773 Lite  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BFD
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '23 at 02:15
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 78.9
1-Core 176
2-Core 346
105% 200 Pts
4-Core 673
8-Core 1,176
112% 925 Pts
64-Core 1,369
85% 1,369 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 1681) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 49.6
Parallax 77.6
35% 56.5 fps
MRender 26.4
Gravity 43.8
Splatting 52.3
35% 40.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3329 3259 1293 574 501 543 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 1,594
Write 3,383
Mixed 2,173
SusWrite 1,583
497% 2,183 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 257
4K Mixed 103
372% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1,413
DQ Write 952
DQ Mixed 1,237
908% 1,201 MB/s
Poor: 205%
This bench: 328%
Great: 399%
Samsung PSSD T7 Shield 1TB
747GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 583
Write 726
Mixed 652
147% 654 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 48.2
158% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 331
254% 344 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD48S40BS8MA-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 47.2
MC Write 50.7
MC Mixed 43.8
135% 47.2 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 50.9
SC Mixed 31.8
106% 37.1 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 128%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UM773 Lite Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Micro UM773 Lite

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback