MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 201%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics207% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D52
MotherboardMSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)  (all builds)
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '23 at 00:14
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$189
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 80.3
1-Core 169
2-Core 333
103% 194 Pts
4-Core 628
8-Core 1,114
105% 871 Pts
64-Core 1,484
92% 1,484 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$615
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
207% Outstanding
Lighting 303
Reflection 294
Parallax 322
247% 306 fps
MRender 352
Gravity 252
Splatting 186
206% 263 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 207%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614600WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,594
Write 3929
Mixed 2,760
765% 3,428 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 81.4
292% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,504
DQ Write 1,306
DQ Mixed 1,383
1,042% 1,398 MB/s
Poor: 280% Great: 578%
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
899GB free
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2347 2249 2256 1602 1444 1152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
400% Outstanding
Read 3508
Write 2,252
Mixed 2,223
SusWrite 1,842
548% 2,456 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 77.8
264% 98.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,588
DQ Write 1371
DQ Mixed 1,484
1,111% 1,481 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 400%
Great: 578%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4800 C20 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 37.1
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 34.8
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 96%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52) Builds (Compare 799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $980
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback