Asus B85M-G R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B85M-G R2.0  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1824 x 1026 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 21:35
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 105
2-Core 194
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 488
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.2% Very good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 122
Parallax 84.4
75% 99.6 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 107
Splatting 86.4
87% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 261 60 74 69 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 496
Write 199
Mixed 330
SusWrite 130
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 38.2
144% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 189
165% 243 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 91%
ST14000NM001G-2KJ103 14TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 160 149 156 164 149 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 152
Write 153
Mixed 100
SusWrite 154
32% 140 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 1.3
44% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 3.2
DQ Write 17.8
DQ Mixed 2.6
4% 7.87 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 90%
WD WD20EFZX-68AWUN0 2TB
106GB free
Firmware: 81.00B81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 85 87 90 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 74.7
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 87.3
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
204% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 115%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
159GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 36 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 33.4
Write 34.3
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 37.1
25% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 1315 CT102464BD160B.M16 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.5% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 16.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G R2.0 Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback