Lenovo 24491E8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 24491E8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 24491E8
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 12:07
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 74
2-Core 114
54% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 217
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M
Legend(17AA 21F5) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8628
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 4.5
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 4.2
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000L7 256GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03L6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 400
Write 174
Mixed 209
57% 261 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 24.7
90% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 182
150% 217 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 101%
Disque C+ 500GB
74GB free, PID 1f05
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 61
Write 18.2
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 23.1
36% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
31% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT1024648F160B.C16 059B CT102464BF160B.C16 0194 SH5641G8FJ8NWRNSQG Elpida EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.6% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 14.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11.3
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 24491E8 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 24491E8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $272
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback