Acer Aspire A315-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A315-41  (all builds)
MotherboardRR Metapod_RR
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime26 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 07:02
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 146
54% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 210
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
Acer(1025 1259) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.7
4% 7.23 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 6
Splatting 11.3
7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen11sm19ar128sdkm2 128GB 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0807A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 34 29 37 34 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
45% Average
Read 443
Write 252
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 35.3
41% 190 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 12.9
72% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 18.8
DQ Mixed 22.3
34% 69.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45%
Great: 80%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
109GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 76 74 71 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 141
Write 137
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 72.6
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.6
229% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Adata AO1P24HC4N2-BWCS 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.1% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 22.4
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-41 Builds (Compare 459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback