Lenovo 20C5S01L00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20C5S01L00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20C5S01L00
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 03:00
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4000M-$259
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 45.5
1-Core 41.3
2-Core 98.4
36% 61.7 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 153
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Legend(17AA 5028) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.5% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 4.7
2% 4.83 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 4
3% 3.1 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 302 367 288 333 371 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 432
Write 361
Mixed 350
SusWrite 333
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 26.7
89% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 198
153% 211 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
21.6% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 7.1
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.6
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20C5S01L00 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20C5S01L00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $359
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback