EVGA X299 DARK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardEVGA X299 DARK  (all builds)
Memory78.5 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200413
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 02:43
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 65
1-Core 117
2-Core 237
75% 140 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 850
79% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,524
94% 1,524 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
117% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 172
Parallax 163
134% 166 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 146
Splatting 109
98% 121 fps
Poor: 114%
This bench: 117%
Great: 140%
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 119
Parallax 106
82% 108 fps
MRender 97.9
Gravity 100
Splatting 91.3
78% 96.5 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$300
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT343.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1085 543 467 835 894 899 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,331
Write 1,487
Mixed 1,399
SusWrite 787
282% 1,251 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 45.7
141% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 582
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 440
327% 440 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 165%
Great: 313%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$300
1TB free
Firmware: RKT343.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2080 2137 2054 977 981 990 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,259
Write 1,244
Mixed 1,540
SusWrite 1,536
316% 1,395 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 47.9
147% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 490
366% 496 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 213%
Great: 313%
Crucial_CT2050MX300SSD1 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 330 333 266 251 253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 202
Write 253
Mixed 152
SusWrite 292
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 20.2
73% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 234
166% 210 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 99%
ST20000NM007D-3DJ103 20TB
10TB free
Firmware: SN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 231 231 232 232 236 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 186
Write 174
Mixed 115
SusWrite 233
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 0.1
47% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.1
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 0.7
3% 6.5 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 47%
ST20000NM007D-3DJ103 20TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 188 188 190 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 218
Write 200
Mixed 122
SusWrite 188
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 9.77 MB/s
DQ Read 0.1
DQ Write 17.4
DQ Mixed 0.5
3% 6 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x31.7GB
3 of 8 slots used
95GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.9% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 9.2
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 9.6
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 DARK Builds (Compare 335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO

Motherboard: EVGA X299 DARK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,372
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback