HP EliteBook 8570p

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8570p (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 17A7
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190411
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '23 at 22:11
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3520M 19,660 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 72.7 2-Core 108 50% 81.5 Pts	4-Core 165 8-Core 183 23% 174 Pts	64-Core 185 12% 185 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M 12,745 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 17A9) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	3.79% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 4.6 Parallax 4.2 4% 4.57 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 4.1 3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.79% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 287 265 245 226 218 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 414 Write 310 Mixed 249 SusWrite 259 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 51.7 4K Mixed 25.6 88% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 247 207% 301 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 129%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB 4,756 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 40 40 41 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	26.1% Poor	Read 50.4 Write 34.1 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 39.7 29% 39.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 67%
Seagate Ultra Slim MT 2TB 1,663 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 70GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 28 29 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Read 51.7 Write 25.1 Mixed 23 SusWrite 28.3 24% 32 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.7 167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF186D.16F 2x8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1867 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	58% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 19.3 60% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 16.7 46% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8570p Builds (Compare 452 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8570p

CPU
Core i5-3320MIntel $199Bench 48%, 30,496 samples	97x
Core i5-3360MIntel $594Bench 54%, 5,754 samples	65x
Core i7-3520MIntelBench 53%, 19,660 samples	63x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	293x
Radeon HD 7500MAMDBench 4%, 12,745 samples	156x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 1x4GBMicronBench 27%, 6,018 samples	11x
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $199

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16