TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 27-ca1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 27-ca1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89E9
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221012
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMar 20 '23 at 17:24
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 80.3
1-Core 182
2-Core 334
106% 199 Pts
4-Core 662
8-Core 1,094
107% 878 Pts
64-Core 1,788
111% 1,788 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
HP(103C 89E9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3118
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.1% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 55.2
49% 59.7 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 49.7
Splatting 47.6
44% 54.1 fps
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 47.1%
 Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL41T0HBLB-00BH1 1TB
847GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NHAV Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1607 1530 1424 1232 935 863 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,906
Write 1,698
Mixed 1,640
SusWrite 1265
366% 1,627 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 66.9
216% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 703
493% 638 MB/s
Poor: 204% ↑
This bench: 248%
 Great: 326%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$579
6.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 425 426 424 421 422 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 415
Write 382
Mixed 351
SusWrite 424
89% 393 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 18
60% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 334
244% 321 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 75.1%
 Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4S2S8MF-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 35.3
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 25.8
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 77% ↑
This bench: 98.3%
 Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 27-ca1xxx Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 27-ca1xxx

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700T12thBench 93%, 637 samples79x
Gen Intel Core i5-12400T12thBench 83%, 216 samples28x
Core i9-12900KIntel  $264Bench 117%, 66,991 samples2x
GPU
UHD Graphics 770IntelBench 8%, 19,750 samples65x
UHD Graphics 730IntelBench 6%, 14,644 samples29x
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 55%, 38,648 samples14x
SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNU010TZH 1TBNvmeBench 293%, 346 samples26x
SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00BH1 1TBNvmeBench 183%, 197 samples24x
KBG50ZNV512G KIOXIA 512GBNvmeBench 166%, 341 samples13x
RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples28x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GBHynixBench 88%, 37,566 samples12x
M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 64%, 6,868 samples10x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback