Asus Pro Q670M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Pro Q670M-C  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '23 at 16:52
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 73.2
1-Core 197
2-Core 392
114% 221 Pts
4-Core 768
8-Core 1,430
131% 1,099 Pts
64-Core 2237
138% 2237 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 109%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 2489) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 174
Parallax 162
146% 172 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 136
Splatting 117
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000G 1TB
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8442105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1437 1562 1624 1629 1632 1630 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,329
Write 1,611
Mixed 994
SusWrite 1,586
312% 1,380 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 232
4K Mixed 26.3
232% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 1,185
DQ Mixed 427
459% 744 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 256%
Great: 246%
Team T253X2256G 256GB
236GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 227 85 96 84 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 446
Mixed 390
SusWrite 169
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 41.4
162% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 202
177% 262 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 93%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
465GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 220 217 221 214 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 150
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 217
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 118%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 23R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
129% Outstanding
MC Read 52.3
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 47
141% 49.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 48.3
SC Mixed 27.7
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 94.1
42% 94.1 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 129%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro Q670M-C Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro Q670M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback