Lenovo 30A6S0AC05

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30A6S0AC05  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 102F
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211030
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '23 at 09:10
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 173
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 597
56% 465 Pts
64-Core 1,842
114% 1,842 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M6000
Nvidia(10DE 1129) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.4% Very good
Lighting 90.7
Reflection 107
Parallax 95.3
74% 97.5 fps
MRender 88.2
Gravity 91.2
Splatting 78
70% 85.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 214 228 166 171 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 448
Write 200
Mixed 412
SusWrite 191
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 33.8
106% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 255
205% 290 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 100%
Drevo X1 pro 256G 256GB
186GB free
Firmware: 0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 421 420 427 427 427 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 421
Mixed 375
SusWrite 425
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 38
126% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 220
187% 273 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G1A2 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 57.4
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 42.6
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 118%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30A6S0AC05 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: Lenovo 30A6S0AC05

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback