TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z210 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z210 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1588h
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110812
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 20 '23 at 02:38
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 121
53% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 118
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 47%
 Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1588) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 0.65%
 Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
164GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 372 398 392 387 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 362
Write 366
Mixed 303
SusWrite 378
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 37.2
120% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 202
156% 215 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 84.9%
 Great: 124%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$43
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 63 65 69 57 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 59.8
Write 35.9
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 60.8
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 34.6%
 Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CK0 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 31.2%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z210 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z210 Workstation

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel  $137Bench 67%, 185,630 samples342x
Core i5-2400Intel  $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples124x
Xeon E3-1240IntelBench 70%, 2,292 samples115x
GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples107x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples83x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples68x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples34x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples20x
RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples17x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples12x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples12x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $164
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback