Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics67.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220507
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMar 20 '23 at 00:16
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900-$281
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 85.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 288
95% 174 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1,032
97% 805 Pts
64-Core 1,533
95% 1,533 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Asus(1043 86BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 517.40
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.8% Good
Lighting 90.7
Reflection 86.4
Parallax 74.6
74% 83.9 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 67.7
56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
347GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1938 1922 1923 2070 2031 2020 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,552
Write 2,169
Mixed 1,282
SusWrite 1,984
447% 1,996 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 66
222% 77.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,272
DQ Write 790
DQ Mixed 988
748% 1,017 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 338%
Great: 393%
OCZ VERTEX2 180GB
140GB free
Firmware: 1.37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 65 56 55 56 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
46% Average
Read 149
Write 86.4
Mixed 111
SusWrite 60.5
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 24.9
101% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 86.1
DQ Mixed 97
80% 117 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46%
Great: 48%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 112 112 113 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 106
Write 103
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 111
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 86%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
648GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 87 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 88.1
Write 91.8
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 85.4
57% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.6% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 22.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,070 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $627
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback