HP Laptop 14-dq1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemHP Laptop 14-dq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86C8
Memory3.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 21:16
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
44.1% Average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 95.9
42% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 254
26% 212 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
HP(103C 86C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.35% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.2 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 7.7
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.35%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA256TCK-1AS1AABHA 256GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0V23
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,116
Write 898
Mixed 705
201% 906 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 26.5
110% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 69
DQ Mixed 37.2
73% 156 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 187%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
16GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 85.6
Write 15.7
Mixed 25.7
41% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.1
133% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4S9S1ME-4 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 12.9
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14-dq1xxx Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-dq1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback