Medion ERAZER P6705 MD61401

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion ERAZER P6705 MD61401  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION N857EX1M
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180719
Uptime28.9 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 21:03
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 193
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 504
55% 437 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 852B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.83% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 6.2
4% 17.1 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9
6% 6.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.83%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 167 174 193 168 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,367
Write 1,083
Mixed 976
SusWrite 201
202% 907 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 54.8
180% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 771
DQ Write 416
DQ Mixed 240
273% 476 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 149%
Great: 236%
Seagate ST1500LM012-1R817G 1.5TB
748GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 111 108 106 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 62.2
Write 95.3
Mixed 54.1
SusWrite 108
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
198% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.9% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 10.7
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.1
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ERAZER P6705 MD61401 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Medion ERAZER P6705 MD61401

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback