| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | JW JW-H67M-USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120629 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 19 '23 at 20:19 |
| Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
| Run User | IRN-User |
| Background CPU | 88% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
47.2%
Average
|
52% 78.8 Pts
|
11% 82.8 Pts
|
6% 88.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
3.39%
Terrible
|
4% 3.3 fps
|
3% 3.93 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 2.5 240GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42051100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 163 148 108 120 98 MB/s
|
40.9%
Average
|
40% 178 MB/s
|
76% 25.2 MB/s
|
29% 39.6 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
23GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 105 115 111 112 101 MB/s
|
59.8%
Above average
|
58% 80.6 MB/s
|
140% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.7 9.5 8.2 9.6 9.7 MB/s
|
16% 17.9 MB/s
|
127% 11.4 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown U3A4G83-13G9HN2B00 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.6%
Poor
|
23% 7.93 GB/s
|
23% 8.13 GB/s
|
52% 77.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical JW-H67M-USB3 Builds (Compare 10 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: JW JW-H67M-USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Pentium G2020Intel $92Bench 49%, 15,664 samples | 3x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 2x |
| Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples | 4x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 3x |
| Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $92 |