Asrockrack EPC602D8A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrockrack EPC602D8A  (all builds)
Memory121.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 20:08
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 77
1-Core 53.9
2-Core 82.2
47% 71 Pts
4-Core 122
8-Core 327
25% 225 Pts
64-Core 749
46% 749 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.6% Poor
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 77.6
Parallax 75.3
6% 53.4 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 56.4
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,446
Write 3,414
Mixed 3,341
760% 3,401 MB/s
4K Read 136
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 79.5
362% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 318
237% 317 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
348GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1354 1219 1219 1212 1212 1194 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,416
Write 1,358
Mixed 670
SusWrite 1,235
263% 1,170 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 35.5
112% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 344
247% 318 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 181%
Great: 302%
WD WD4003FFBX-68MU3 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 136 134 135 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 224
Write 226
Mixed 99.6
SusWrite 135
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.8
370% 3 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 138%
WD WD101KFBX-68R56N0 10TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 139 140 138 139 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 211
Write 228
Mixed 91.4
SusWrite 139
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 1
296% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 101%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B4G70BM0- 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 29.2
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EPC602D8A Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrockrack EPC602D8A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback