Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMar 19 '23 at 07:36
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 179
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 418
45% 360 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
XFX(1682 304A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 204 62 71 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 475
Write 284
Mixed 328
SusWrite 130
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 29.8
124% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 169
149% 219 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 91%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$81
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 119 122 121 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 136
Write 113
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 121
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL M378B5173QH0-CK0 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback