Oegstone H81M-P-SI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemOegstone H81M-P-SI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H81M-P-SI
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151008
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 23:59
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 168
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 255
33% 250 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 3.9
3% 3.2 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3G3P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 341 356 335 344 342 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 279
Write 315
Mixed 277
SusWrite 343
69% 304 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 72.8
4K Mixed 31.1
113% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 193
152% 206 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30
231GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 65 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 62.3
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 65.1
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-P-SI Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone H81M-P-SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback