Asrock J4125B-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock J4125B-ITX  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200117
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 17:38
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4125
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 41.1
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 118
40% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 205
25% 192 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 2.1
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.17%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM01.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 246 246 249 251 252 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 349
Write 415
Mixed 305
SusWrite 262
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 30
120% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 194
172% 260 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron_ 4ATF51264HZ-2G3H1R 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.1% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 12.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical J4125B-ITX Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J4125B-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $32
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback