MSI A75MA-G55 (MS-7696)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7696
MotherboardMSI A75MA-G55 (MS-7696)  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110921
Uptime20.9 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 16:47
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3850 APU-$80
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 51.4
1-Core 39.6
2-Core 84.5
36% 58.5 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 131
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Gigabyte(1458 2206) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.27% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 5.5
4% 5.43 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 5
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.27%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9.7
Write 34.3
Mixed 15.5
15% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 75%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 157 160 170 166 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 86.6
Write 103
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 164
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
221% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 87%
USB3.2 FLASH DRIVE 32GB
26GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.3
Write 23.9
Mixed 25.3
33% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.1
71% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA1339.M16F 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7.8
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75MA-G55 (MS-7696) Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A75MA-G55 (MS-7696)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback