Asus Zenbook UP6502ZD_Q539ZD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Zenbook UP6502ZD_Q539ZD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UP6502ZD
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220630
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 15:09
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 63
1-Core 187
2-Core 362
104% 204 Pts
4-Core 679
8-Core 1,155
111% 917 Pts
64-Core 1,816
112% 1,816 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A370M Graphics
Asus(1043 1F8C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1325
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.5% Below average
Lighting 45.3
Reflection 38.4
Parallax 30.2
37% 38 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 67.4
39% 44 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB
732GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1598 1763 1607 1753 1247 1087 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,080
Write 1,500
Mixed 1,500
SusWrite 1,509
369% 1,648 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 77.2
256% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,429
DQ Write 480
DQ Mixed 995
724% 968 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 297%
Great: 326%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
128% Outstanding
MC Read 55.5
MC Write 47
MC Mixed 46.7
142% 49.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 47.5
SC Mixed 23.9
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 128%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Zenbook UP6502ZD_Q539ZD Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Asus Zenbook UP6502ZD_Q539ZD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback