MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C89
MotherboardMSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 10:08
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 48.6
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 194
61% 114 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 505
54% 427 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 88%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Flare 60GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 56 48 52 54 53 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.7% Below average
Read 242
Write 75.6
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 52.7
25% 115 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 7.1
70% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 80.6
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 60
54% 80.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905599-022.A00G 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.1% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 7.8
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 3,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $281
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback