Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220428
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '23 at 08:54
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 69.2 1-Core 108 2-Core 214 72% 130 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 665 67% 545 Pts	64-Core 831 51% 831 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.59 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.2% Poor	Lighting 35.4 Reflection 38.7 Parallax 36.8 29% 37 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 26.6 27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$75 92,081 User benchmarks, average bench 224% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1619 449 215 150 184 176 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,435 Write 1,568 Mixed 1,593 SusWrite 466 285% 1,266 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 58.4 188% 61.5 MB/s	DQ Read 682 DQ Write 419 DQ Mixed 594 431% 565 MB/s
Poor: 144% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 295%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 265GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 138 137 137 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 160 Mixed 112 SusWrite 137 112% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB 1,820 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.5% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 22.8 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 21.3 61% 21.5 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II Builds (Compare 851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PRO II

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD $125Bench 86%, 14,368 samples	162x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	138x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	122x

GPU
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	113x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	66x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	41x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	24x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $75Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	23x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x

RAM
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	48x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	39x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 104% - Outstanding

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16