Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150211
Uptime	8 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '23 at 04:07
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 89.9 2-Core 174 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 323 8-Core 536 52% 430 Pts	64-Core 703 44% 703 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 3170) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.18 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.6% Above average	Lighting 67.8 Reflection 110 Parallax 68.8 55% 82.2 fps	MRender 71.7 Gravity 64.6 Splatting 61.4 53% 65.9 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 66%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 469 Write 464 Mixed 346 95% 426 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 42.8 139% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 354 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 9GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 468 Write 462 Mixed 363 96% 431 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 44 144% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 350 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
TOSHIBA TransMemory-Mx 32GB 613 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 29GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 39.8 Write 4 Mixed 20.5 22% 21.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 2.1 109% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 24%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2133 C15 3x8GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3 of 8 slots used 24GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	765x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	197x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	116x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $352

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16