HP 750-414

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemHP 750-414  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828A
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 22:10
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 178
62% 111 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 273
36% 271 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 828A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 5.2
4% 5.1 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 7.9
5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 217 182 199 178 164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 337
Write 281
Mixed 262
SusWrite 198
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 13.3
48% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 107%
T-force 1TB 1TB
676GB free
Firmware: SN08690
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 253 217 266 223 227 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 387
Write 304
Mixed 250
SusWrite 240
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 13.2
56% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 27
DQ Mixed 52.3
49% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 109%
T-force 1TB 1TB
104GB free
Firmware: SN08690
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 75 91 171 205 209 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 320
Write 38.9
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 130
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 6.2
36% 9.37 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
644GB free, PID 0100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 60 73 73 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 70.1
Write 72.1
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 70.1
80% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA MK5061GSYN 500GB
162GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 30 36 36 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 34.8
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 34.6
45% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-U16G-2133 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 21.3
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750-414 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP 750-414

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $67
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback