Lenovo 20378

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20378  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo Y50-70
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime24.3 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 18:52
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 155
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 240
27% 212 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3978) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 6.4 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
886GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 336 393 397 345 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 380
Write 389
Mixed 316
SusWrite 320
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 18.1
87% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 31.6
82% 169 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.8% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 17.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20378 Builds (Compare 2,835 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20378

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback