Lenovo 90Q70029GF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemLenovo 90Q70029GF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3307
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 17:12
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 85.5
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 194
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 614
61% 495 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 3307) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.67 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
890GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1147 1126 1104 887 881 856 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,476
Write 1,188
Mixed 1,042
SusWrite 1,000
264% 1,176 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 36.7
152% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 602
421% 539 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 189%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FR 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.9% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 20.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 21.7
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90Q70029GF Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90Q70029GF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback