Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory42.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 17:09
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 201
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 636
63% 514 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 150
Parallax 155
114% 148 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 143
Splatting 126
107% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 439 441 453 451 441 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 479
Write 458
Mixed 417
SusWrite 440
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 31.7
105% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 194
140% 183 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 128%
HGST HMS 5C4040ALE640 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 122 123 128 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 121
Write 129
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 124
130% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 50%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
932GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.6 1.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 168
Write 132
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 1.3
116% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 77%
WDC WD40 02FFWX-68TZ4N0 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 40 11 25 29 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.3% Average
Read 175
Write 189
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 22.2
148% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
184% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 70%
Samsung SSD 750 EVO 500G 500GB
466GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 90 116 93 100 117 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 316
Write 309
Mixed 269
SusWrite 106
328% 250 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 19.9
1,490% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 36.3
DQ Mixed 28.6
2,296% 29.6 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 141%
Great: 293%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10-8GBX F3-14900CL10-8GBX 1866 CL10 Series F3-14900CL10-8GBX F3-14900CL10-8GBX 1866 CL10 Series 48GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
109% Outstanding
MC Read 44.2
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 41.7
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.5
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 89%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback