Foxconn M61PML/M61PML-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn M61PML/M61PML-K  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110120
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 15:48
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 78.6
1-Core 32.4
2-Core 81.6
43% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 121
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 13.3
Reflection 23.6
Parallax 18
11% 18.3 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 18.8
Splatting 16.9
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct500mx5 0 500GB
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 163 165 172 176 165 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.7% Average
Read 146
Write 178
Mixed 140
SusWrite 165
36% 157 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 25.7
75% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.2
DQ Write 57.9
DQ Mixed 41.1
32% 43.7 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 119%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.4
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M61PML/M61PML-K Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn M61PML/M61PML-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback