Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Memory 13.4 1-Core 14 2-Core 22.9 10% 16.8 Pts	4-Core 37.7 8-Core 47.4 5% 42.6 Pts	64-Core 65.3 4% 65.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8576) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.54% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 4 4% 4.07 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 3.8 Splatting 4.9 4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.54% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 106 86 96 104 97 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.6% Poor	Read 128 Write 102 Mixed 87.8 SusWrite 100 24% 105 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 16.6 49% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 38 DQ Write 88.3 DQ Mixed 49.5 42% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 4 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 2.5 8% 2.63 GB/s	Latency 373 11% 373 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x

SSD
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $174

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16