Asrock B360M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B360M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 15:21
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 249
91% 160 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 630
73% 569 Pts
64-Core 721
45% 721 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 93%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 229
Parallax 151
110% 172 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 140
Splatting 124
105% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OSC M.2 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 146 127 85 147 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 417
Write 118
Mixed 151
SusWrite 133
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 9.6
84% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 60.8
70% 119 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
148GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 91 93 92 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 96.4
Write 96.2
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 91.8
64% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KHX2666C15D4/8G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 25.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 26.9
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 58.4
68% 58.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M-HDV Builds (Compare 865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B360M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $487
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback