Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QR_X705QR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X705QR_X705QR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X705QR
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 13:34
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 51.5
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 97.6
40% 67.8 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 134
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 535
Asus(1043 112F) 2GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.54% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 11.2
6% 9.97 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 9.8
8% 9.13 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.54%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
800GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU0C1J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 74 61 75 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 93.4
Write 124
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 79.6
62% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
167% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.3% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 6.9
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback