Asus K53SM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus K53SM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53SM
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 10:08
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 87.7
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 120
58% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 146
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M
Asus(1043 212E) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 1.9
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 3.1
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500BX500SSD1 500GB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 312 348 339 234 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 447
Write 368
Mixed 343
SusWrite 237
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 0.9
40% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 48
DQ Mixed 0.9
25% 63.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
48.9% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53SM Builds (Compare 79 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback