Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 01:55
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$180
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 186
65% 116 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 697
59% 510 Pts
64-Core 903
56% 903 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 64%
Great: 108%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 224 146 145 153 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 1,122
Write 584
Mixed 553
SusWrite 158
133% 604 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 28.9
99% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 610
DQ Write 450
DQ Mixed 401
335% 487 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 109%
Great: 271%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 49 55 53 50 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 111
Write 116
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 49.5
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
197GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 60 71 90 85 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 47.8
Write 70.4
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 68.7
47% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
158% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87
238GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 97 103 102 102 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 48.4
Write 105
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 97.1
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
160% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 87%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
238GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 157 164 165 161 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 196
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 148
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.9
275% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 105%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
157GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 108 116 121 113 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 97.8
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 104
66% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 87%
WD WD80EDBZ-11B0ZA0 8TB
288GB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 156 162 188 178 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 188
Mixed 92.9
SusWrite 159
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.4
314% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 117%
WD WD101EMAZ-11G7DA0 10TB
125GB free
Firmware: 0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 112 113 140 127 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 112
Write 131
Mixed 61.1
SusWrite 115
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 118%
WD WD101EDBZ-11B1DA0 10TB
127GB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 107 118 128 130 123 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 78.4
Write 109
Mixed 55
SusWrite 108
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.7
166% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 116%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25
291GB free
Firmware: 1K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 48 55 52 52 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 121
Write 112
Mixed 67.6
SusWrite 49.9
65% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 90%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25
290GB free
Firmware: 1K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 104 90 99 112 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 87.6
Write 96.6
Mixed 65
SusWrite 95.6
64% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3001 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 28.8
88% 30.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $651
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback