Gigabyte GA-B150N Phoenix-WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B150N Phoenix-WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B150N Phoenix-WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '17 at 08:01
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 218
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 348
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4627
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
6.14% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 5.84
5% 7.31 fps
MRender 5.86
Gravity 5.27
Splatting 14.5
8% 8.55 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.14%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 492
Write 268
Mixed 278
76% 346 MB/s
4K Read 39.6
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 22.6
123% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 60.7
86% 160 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 110%
Seagate ST3320311CS 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: CA12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 96.1
Mixed 102
74% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.37
96% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 50%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
214GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 94.6
Mixed 98
74% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.21
72% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
76GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 51.4
Write 54.2
Mixed 49.6
39% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 0.13
4K Mixed 0.11
27% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 47%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
22GB free, PID 4100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Read 12.7
Write 9.67
Mixed 10.2
14% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.39
4K Write 0.48
4K Mixed 0.31
40% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-023.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
37.6% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.1
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B150N Phoenix-WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150N Phoenix-WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback